[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Are dinosaurs really reptiles? (2)



I think this was sent off-list by mistake.

Cheers
Nick

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:21 AM, david wesley nystuen <egypt4@msn.com> wrote:
>
> Talk about beating a dead horse, lets move on.  Endless blabber does not
> prove anything.
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>  > Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:40:34 -0400
> > From: nick.gardner@gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: Are dinosaurs really reptiles? (2)
> > To: dinosaur@usc.edu
>
>
> >
> > I'll defer to Müller and Reisz (2006) based on what little I am aware
> > of. A simplification of their topology from a 50% majority rule
> > consensus tree:
> > --+--Seymouriamorpha
> > |--Diadectomorpha
> > `--+--Caseidae
> > `--+--+--Mesosauridae
> > | `--+--Millerettidae
> > | `--Procolophonidae
> > `--+--Coelostegus
> > `--+--+--Thuringothyris
> > | `--(Captorhinids)
> > `--+--Brouffia
> > `--+--Paleothyris
> > `--+--Hylonomus
> > `--+--+--Protorothyris
> > | |--Anthracodromeus
> > | `--Cephalerpeton
> > `--+--Petrolacosaurus
> > `--Araeoscelis
> >
> > Müller, J. and Reisz, R. 2006. The Phylogeny of Early Eureptiles:
> > Comparing Parsimony and Bayesian Approaches in the Investigation of a
> > Basal Fossil Clade. Systematic Biology 55 (3): 503-511.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:01 AM, David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > What series of taxa do you all think precedes Petrolacosaurus?
> > >
> > >
> > > David Peters
> > > 1247 Highland Terrace
> > > St. Louis, MO 63117-1712
> > > 314-781-1795 phone and fax
> > > 314-323-7776 cell
> > >
> > > davidpeters@att.net
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>