[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: New theropod (or is it?) from Poland
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dawid Mazurek" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:28 PM
Oh, the museum actually is in Lisowice! The brick pit is in Lipie ÅlÄskie
Apologies, BTW, for butchering the spelling that badly. I knew there's no n
in it, and I knew there's an e at the end, and I even knew why! Must have
been the time pressure; I left for Serbia the same day, to see most of that
branch of the family for the first time... I came back this morning.
>Both features occur throughout rauisuchians and never in theropods.
Isn't "rauisuchian" just a term for a grade? They don't have any
autapomorphies, don't they?
The last few phylogenetic analyses have indeed found them to be
paraphyletic. But none of them are reasonably large, as far as I know, and
most date to 1994 and before. (The *Qianosuchus* paper from 2006 finds a big
polytomy...) The main reason, as lamented in the description of *Postosuchus
alisonae* (JVP June 2008), is that detailed descriptions don't exist for
most "rauisuchian" species. I simply tried to cut this long story short.
Given the unique gait (vertical femur with dorsally-pointing head and
ventrally-pointing acetabulum -- seen very nicely in the *Lotosaurus*
exhibited in Beijing) that is said to characterize all rauisuchians plus
aetosaurs, I wouldn't be surprised if they turned out to be monophyletic.
But I have no idea how widespread it really is, how many grades of it exist,
and so on. I'm not among the very few experts on those animals.