[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Oryctos is back

David M. wrote:

Because BANDits don't read the Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 
including the paper by Senter (2005) that showed [Longisquama is] not even a 

Give Senter 2005 another careful read. He got very few things right with regard 
to Coelurosauravus and Longisquama. The parietal "bumps" he employs as a 
synapomorphy linking the two are not the parietal in either taxon, for instance.

And BTW what a "crown group diapsid" is needs to be called into question. 

 David Peters