[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Oryctos is back
David M. wrote:
Because BANDits don't read the Journal of Systematic Palaeontology,
including the paper by Senter (2005) that showed [Longisquama is] not even a
Give Senter 2005 another careful read. He got very few things right with regard
to Coelurosauravus and Longisquama. The parietal "bumps" he employs as a
synapomorphy linking the two are not the parietal in either taxon, for instance.
And BTW what a "crown group diapsid" is needs to be called into question.