[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: No Jurassic Park IV
I have to go with JP1 as the best, but I could be persuaded that 3 was
better than 2 as a movie experience, despite issues with the pterosaurs
and aquatic Spinosaurus breaking Trex's neck....
James E. Whitcraft
University Relations and Communications
Support Services Building, Room 127
Indiana UniversityâPurdue University Fort Wayne
2101 E. Coliseum Blvd.
Fort Wayne, IN 46805-1499
>>> Paul Penkalski <email@example.com> 12/09/08 2:23 AM >>>
Jurassic Park 3 was the best of the three. It's rare for sequels
to be better than their prequels, but JP3 was just a better put
together flick than JP or especially TLW-JP2. I'm keeping my
fingers crossed for a JP4.....
--- On Mon, 12/8/08, firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>
> Subject: No Jurassic Park IV
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 10:40 AM
> Probably not going to happen:
> Jurassic Park 3 was bad enough for 2 movies.