[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: No Jurassic Park IV
I concur with everything accept JP3 being better than the first. The first
movie will always hold a special spot for really bringing dinosaurs to life on
the big screen. That's something that can only happen once.
Short of that, JP3 was loads better than The Lost World: Jurassic Park. At
least the dinosaurs in JP3 had a chance to act like real animals. TLW:JP was
nothing more than a hokey monster movie (especially the completely unnecessary
I think the third sequel gets such a bad rap mostly for the - admittedly
pointless - _T.rex_ vs. S_aegyptiacus_ scene. God forbid superhero _T.rex_
turns out not to be the greatest animal of all time.
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Paul Penkalski <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> From: Paul Penkalski <email@example.com>
> Subject: Re: No Jurassic Park IV
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 2:23 AM
> Jurassic Park 3 was the best of the three. It's rare for
> to be better than their prequels, but JP3 was just a better
> together flick than JP or especially TLW-JP2. I'm
> keeping my
> fingers crossed for a JP4.....
> --- On Mon, 12/8/08, email@example.com
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Subject: No Jurassic Park IV
> > To: email@example.com
> > Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 10:40 AM
> > Probably not going to happen:
> > Jurassic Park 3 was bad enough for 2 movies.
> > Mary
> > --