[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: No Jurassic Park IV



On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Paul Penkalski <turtlecroc@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jurassic Park 3 was the best of the three. It's rare for sequels
> to be better than their prequels, but JP3 was just a better put
> together flick than JP or especially TLW-JP2. I'm keeping my
> fingers crossed for a JP4.....

How could that one be the best? They didn't even finish the movie!
-- 
T. Michael Keesey
Technical Consultant and Developer, Internet Technologies
Glendale, California