[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: No Jurassic Park IV

I too found JP3 to be vastly superior to JP2 (although neither were as good as the first for my money). That's not to say JP3 wasn't flawed, but far less so than JP2 in my eyes. YMMV.

Scott Hartman
Science Director
Wyoming Dinosaur Center
110 Carter Ranch Rd.
Thermopolis, WY 82443
(800) 455-3466 ext. 230
Cell: (307) 921-8333


-----Original Message-----
From: T. Michael Keesey <keesey@gmail.com>
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Sent: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:05 am
Subject: Re: No Jurassic Park IV

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Paul Penkalski <turtlecroc@yahoo.com> wrote:
Jurassic Park 3 was the best of the three. It's rare for sequels
to be better than their prequels, but JP3 was just a better put
together flick than JP or especially TLW-JP2. I'm keeping my
fingers crossed for a JP4.....

How could that one be the best? They didn't even finish the movie! -- T. Michael Keesey Technical Consultant and Developer, Internet Technologies Glendale, California