[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: No Jurassic Park IV



I agree JP3 was better than 2, but the script of both was vastly inferior to 
that of the first.

They substituted a decent plot with more CGI dinosaurs.


--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: No Jurassic Park IV
> To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 10:55 AM
> With all the errors you mention, I prefer JP3 over JP2,
> because:
> 
> -There was an spinosaur (sadly without a humpback).
> -there were Ceratosaurus.
> -there were pterosaurs getting mad.
> -there were raptors apparently using their brains to make
> noise (how
> did they understand the sounds they made is not said).
> -I prefer paleontologist Grant over know-it-all
> mathematician Malcolm.
> -in JP2 Bakker's copy was killed and shown as a
> faint-hearted bozo.
> Also, a fool, preferring to be eaten by a T. rex than
> bitten by a
> coral snake.
> -Tea Leoni was in JP3.
> -I dislike JP2 hero played by Vince Vaughn, and more or
> less dislike
> all Vaughn's characters.