[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: 2 news items ...

--- Janet m vandenburgh <van02@cox.net> schrieb:

> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,330048,00.html
> Origin of Birds Debated
> Friday, February 08, 2008
> By Clara Moskowitz
> Dinosaurs are living birds, nearly all scientists
> agree, but a debate still
> continues about when that first early bird glided or
> flew into the Mesozoic
> scene.

And what if there 5 closely related but independently
volant "first birds" giving rise to at least a limited
diversity of "birds"? 

The question as usually phrased works if the smallest
clade containing Archie and _Passr domesticus_
contains neither _Confuciusornis_, nor
_Iberomesornis_, nor _Sapeornis_ - and if Archie
hadn't been found as early as it was, one might
habitually add _Dalianraptor_, _Jixiangornis_ et al.
If this assumption is not correct, all bets are off.


      Heute schon einen Blick in die Zukunft von E-Mails wagen?