[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Editorial in the Albuquerque Journal
- To: Dinosaur Mailing List <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Editorial in the Albuquerque Journal
- From: "T. Michael Keesey" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:07:14 -0800
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <200802111319.DEM71050@md0.mail.umd.edu> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: email@example.com
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
On Feb 11, 2008 5:56 AM, Malcolm McCallum
> I was only indicating that getting your stuff out as
> fast as you can is typically a priority to prevent being the target of
> such unethical behavior.
I don't think this is the fault of the authors, though--the
_Heliocanthus_ paper was accepted 13 months before it was published. I
don't know for certain, but I'd imagine that the _Rioarribasuchus_
paper, which was much shorter and published in-house, had a much
faster turnaround time. Now, I'm sure some of those 13 months were
taken up with revisions, but surely most of that wait was due to the
fact that paper-based journals can only publish so much per issue.
Paper-based journals can't help but have some kind of bottleneck.
In the future, I think the solution will be brought about by the
transition of scientific publication from paper-based journals to
online journals. We're already in the early stages of this, but
there's a long way to go.
Other thoughts on this here:
T. Michael Keesey
Director of Technology
2894 Rowena Avenue Ste. B
Los Angeles, California 90039