[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: 4 winged dino NOVA
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> On Behalf Of Brian Baziak
> >a wind tunnel flight test of a scientific replica of the
> ancient oddity."
> Which just ignores the fact the the hind limbs can not be
> held horizontally. It doesn't matter how well it could work
> if the legs can't get in the position. How much longer will
> we be seeing this four-wing theory before it finally dies?
I have to W4TP (wait for the program), since I haven't seen it yet, but it
could be that their model uses vertically-oriented hindlimbs. SO that they
would not be "wings" proper, but more like the tail vane of a plane.
What bothers me more is: "the creature was like nothing paleontologists had
ever seen before"
Bullcrap. The feathering was arguably 'like nothing paleontologists had ever
seen before', but the skeleton is pretty damn standard dromaeosaurid. That
is one of the imporant points of this critter: it's skeletal anatomy is NOT
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Faculty Director, Earth, Life & Time Program, College Park Scholars
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA