[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Conspiracy Theory- Earth's Expansion

Not if the mass remains the same but is packed in a smaller volume. ONE
of the expansionists theories is that the Earth's mass has remained the
same through time but the Earth has expanded like a balloon from the
internal heat generated. Like I said, I don't buy into the EE theories
(of which there is more than one).

Kenneth Carpenter, Ph.D.
Curator of Lower Vertebrate Paleontology & Chief Preparator
Department of Earth Sciences
Denver Museum of Nature & Science
2001 Colorado Blvd.
Denver, CO 80205 USA

Office phone: 303-370-6392
Museum fax: 303-331-6492
For PDFs of some of my publications, as well as information of the Cedar
Mountain Project:
(if you have problems with the link, cut and paste it into the browser
address bar)
The scientific method is a myth:

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. [mailto:tholtz@umd.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:20 AM
To: Ken Carpenter; d_ohmes@yahoo.com
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: RE: Conspiracy Theory- Earth's Expansion

> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] 
> On Behalf Of Ken.Carpenter@dmns.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 12:56 PM
> To: d_ohmes@yahoo.com
> Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: RE: Conspiracy Theory- Earth's Expansion
> gravity is determined by mass, not diameter.
But surface gravity = Gm/(r^2) (Where G = the gravitational constant).

Since G is a constant, and m would be fixed for the planet, a smaller
would necessarily have a smaller surface gravity.

> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] 
> On Behalf Of franklin e. bliss
> I wonder what H.H. Hess would have thought about this? 

Given that he was one of the key discoverers of subduction, probably not
terribly impressed.

>  I'll keep an open mind for now.  

Don't keep it so open that your brains fall out!!!

An example of a prediction if EE were really:

* Under the model from the video, continent-oceanic boundaries would all
passive margins like the Atlantic seaboard, since there is no
Anyone living around the Ring of Fire (or tracking deep earthquakes, and
on) will confirm that "passive" is not true of their margins.
* An alternative model would be that new material is coming out of the
trenches (i.e., subduction works in reverse). But radiometric, magnetic,
biostratigraphic dates have the reverse: these are the oldest part of
respective basins.

An observation: the Expanding Earth model is somewhat less strong than a
hypothesis that theropods derived from salamanders, sauropodomorphs from
cockroaches, and ornithischians from potatoes. It is a considerably
model than the Feducciaries and other BANDits: their model is
well supported in comparison.

It grieves me to see people that I respect actually giving this the time
day in the 21st Century. Mid-20th Century, sure: the major lines of
weren't in. In their time, Expanding Earth, Contracting Earth (FAR
supported...), and Stabilist Earth have all been proposed. And they have
fallen by the wayside.

I really, Really, REALLY suggest people interested in plate tectonics
older models of Earth systems read up on the literature before
this much furhter.

Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: tholtz@umd.edu   Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216                        
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Fax: 301-314-9661               

Faculty Director, Earth, Life & Time Program, College Park Scholars
Fax: 301-405-0796

Mailing Address:        Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
                        Department of Geology
                        Building 237, Room 1117
                        University of Maryland
                        College Park, MD 20742 USA