[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Turtles and Crocodylians are not Reptiles - no? What are they?
However, Reptilia also excluded birds
> and mammals, both of which are amniotes. So the Reptilia
> never included Aves or Mammalia. So in framing a
> phylogenetic definition of Reptilia it's impossible to
> satisfy all the criteria of "historical usage".
Its impossible to form a monophyletic definition, there is no way to reconcile
the exclusion of birds, or the inclusion of synapsids but not mammals.
But a paraphyletic definition is pretty easy.
Wouldn't this be a good start for a paraphyletic definition:
All aminotes excluding those closer to birds than to crocodiles, and excluding
all those descended from the cynodonts