[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Various other papers of interest in the latest Palaeontology
Tim Williams (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
<(2) The above paragraph implies that the _Tripriodon caperatus_ holotype is a
dinosaur (theropod) tooth after all, rather than from a mammal - correct?>
*Tripriodon* as a genus is a mammal, and from what I can gather, considered a
synonym of *Meniscoessus*. The anterior premolars are narrow, low-crowned, and
blade like with very "coarse" denticulations that look like reptilian serrae.
*T. caperatus* is not, to my knowledge, currently considered a dinosaur, and if
I had my old hd available, I could check my notes on it.
That's all I got, for now.