[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Various other papers of interest in the latest Palaeontology
Tim Williams wrote-
> (1) None of these nomenclatural acrobatics qualify yet as a formal
> (2) The above paragraph implies that the _Tripriodon caperatus_ holotype is a
> dinosaur (theropod) tooth after all, rather than from a mammal - correct?
Tripriodon was based on teeth assigned to two species by Marsh (1889)- the
genotype T. coelatus, and T. caperatus. The former is a junior synonym of the
multituberculate Meniscoessus robustus (as first shown by Osborn, 1891), while
the second belongs to Paronychodon (as first shown by Estes, 1964). Estes was
incorrect in synonymizing Tripriodon itself with Paronychodon however, as T.
caperatus is only a referred species. This also prevents Marsh's
Tripriodontidae from being a theropod family.
In more detail....
Marsh (1889) originally described Tripriodon caperatus based on several teeth
and tooth fragments, including supposed lower incisors. The holotype is often
listed as YPM 11853, but is 11852 in the YPM online catalog. Although Marsh
states the specimen came from Laramie beds, the Laramie Formation has not
yielded dinosaurs in Wyoming, and the YPM online catalog confirms it was
actually found in the Lance Formation. Marsh viewed T. caperatus and the
genotype T. coelatus as belonging to a new family Tripriodontidae in his
Allotheria, most closely related to Stereognathus (now recognized as a
tritylodontid). Tripriodon coelatus is based on a molar which is now thought to
belong to Meniscoessus robustus, a species of multituberculate. This was first
recognized by Osborn (1891), who believed T. caperatus were lower incisors of
Meniscoessus. Osborn also recognized supposed lower incisors of Selenacodon
brevis (YPM 10630) and Tripriodon coelatus (YPM coll.) have the same morphology
caperatus. Selenacodon brevis is now viewed as a junior synonym of the
multituberculate Cimolemys gracilis. Estes (1964) incorrectly believed T.
caperatus to be the genotype, and was the first of many authors to synonymize
Tripriodon with Paronychodon. He referred the T. caperatus holotype and YPM
10630 to Paronychodon lacustris. Currie et al. (1990) mistakenly listed
Dipriodon caperatus, but Dipriodon is another genus now viewed as a synonym of
The holotype tooth seems nearly identical to the Paronychodon holotype except
for having a shorter crown. It clearly matches tooth type A of Sankey et al.
(2002). Baszio (1997) notes these Lance Formation teeth are larger than
Paronychodon lacustris from the Milk River, Dinosaur Park, Frenchman and
Horseshoe Canyon Formations, with more pronounced wrinkles. They are retained
as Paronychodon caperatus on my (currently offline) website, after Olshevsky
Marsh, 1889. Discovery of Cretaceous mammalia. American Journal of Science, 3rd
series. 38, 81-92.
Osborn, 1891. A review of the "Discovery of the Cretaceous Mammalia". The
American Naturalist. 25(295), 595-611.
Estes, 1964. Fossil vertebrates from the Late Cretaceous Lance Formation,
eastern Wyoming. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences.
Currie, Rigby and Sloan, 1990. Theropod teeth from the Judith River Formation
of southern Alberta, Canada. in Carpenter and Currie (eds.). Dinosaur
Systematics: Perspectives and Approaches. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Olshevsky, 1991. A Revison of the Parainfraclass Archosauria Cope, 1869,
Excluding the Advanced Crocodyila. Mesozoic Menanderings #2 (1st printing). iv
Baszio, 1997. Investigations on Canadian dinosaurs: systematic palaeontology of
isolated dinosaur teeth from the Latest Cretaceous of south Alberta, Canada.
Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg. 196, 33-77.
Sankey, Brinkman, Guenther and Currie, 2002. Small theropod and bird teeth from
the Late Cretaceous (Late Campanian) Judith River Group, Alberta. Journal of
Paleontology. 76(4), 751-763.