[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: vaulting pterosaur launch: I give up
I agree with Mike. The illustrations have to be quantitative to have any
meaning, and can only be used for visualization, not as a research tool.
Which is why John and I have never done anything with the time-stepping
illustrtions of the quetz launch that we did for the ICVP VII poster.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Habib" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "jrc" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: vaulting pterosaur launch: I give up
I wouldn't become too overly focused on illustrations as demonstration,
in any case. Visualizing a dynamic process like launch is very helpful,
but the illustrations themselves are more a depiction of the conclusions
than a source of evidence (and leave lots of room for artistic license,
if not constrained by quantitative evidence). The evidence really comes,
in this case, from the structural mechanics and quantitative analysis.