[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
That model is more well stablished for insect flight.
Leading edge vortices (LEVs) are actually known in several birds and
bats now, as well. This is predictable, of course: we can expect LEV
use in just about any flapping flyers with the proper leading edge
shape that fly in the prerequisite Reynolds Number range. In fact,
since most flying animals have a sharp leading edge, at least
outboard, LEV usage is probably pretty ubiquitous, though it is
presumably less pronounced in the larger birds and bats. The
turbulent boundary layer does help the LEV stay attached to the wing,
but I wouldn't describe it as "drag over the wing", per se. Effects
that are associated with increased lift or drag coefficients need not
be a direct result of increased drag or lift.
--Asymmetric feathers shift the point of maximum t/c ratio forward,
usual results. However, shifting it aftward usually results in
I would speculate that the evolution of asymmetric feathers had
more to do
with reducing feather mass than reducing drag or increasing lift.
Reducing feather mass? Reducing feather total area?
The asymmetric structure results in reduced mass requirements because
the resultant shape is more resistant to twisting under aerodynamic
load. A symmetric feather can be built to resist the loads just as
well, but at the cost of being more robust, and thus more massive.
Therefore, an asymmetric feather is structurally advantageous in terms
of material distribution.
Not to the best of my knowledge. However, with the exception of mass
effects (and at very high lift coefficients), the wings would
the same even if the individual feathers were shaped like planks,
With no effect on airflux?
What exactly do you mean by "airflux" in this case?
Michael Habib, M.S.
Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
1830 E. Monument Street
Baltimore, MD 21205