[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Mike Habib <email@example.com> wrote:
> Effects that are associated with increased lift or drag coefficients need
> not be a
> direct result of increased drag or lift.
Surely. But if it was an *indirect* result of increased drag the
latter could be a target for selection.
> The asymmetric structure results in reduced mass requirements because the
> resultant shape is more resistant to twisting under aerodynamic load. A
> symmetric feather can be built to resist the loads just as well, but at the
> cost of being more robust, and thus more massive. Therefore, an asymmetric
> feather is structurally advantageous in terms of material distribution.
How much weight it could reduce?
>> With no effect on airflux?
> What exactly do you mean by "airflux" in this case?
Pattern of the movement of the molecules in the air.