[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
AW: SV: Question -- was shaking bird trees
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: AW: SV: Question -- was shaking bird trees
- From: evelyn sobielski <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:29:08 +0000 (GMT)
- In-reply-to: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA/xt6+TEsFEq5C5BW2p9mKcKAAAAQAAAAwN/vtKbyUE+x8jUSpx6AhAEAAAAA@norrkoping.mail.telia.com>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
> Probably not. Three diminutive species of flightless
> Acanthisittidae are
> known (Dendroscansor decurvirostris, Pachyplicas yaldwyni,
There may be 2 spp of _Pachyplicas_, and that and _Traversia_ = _Xenicus_ were
largish (for acanthisittid). I also gave _Xenicus longipes_ which could fly
about as well as a kakapo. _Emberiza alcoveri_ was not a giant bunting, so it
was probably a tiny bit smaller than the large flightless acanthisittids. (It
was probably longer though).
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail.
Dem pfiffigeren Posteingang.