[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
It should still be able to use the wing claws as hooks (either on bark or
branches). Wouldn't it be able to use the tail as a brace as well? Then
there's the foot claws (including the second digit to act as crampon).
Finally, there is simply running vertically up the tree (possible for short
distances as can be seen in arboreal goats).
For the last approach one would think that wing assisted incline running (a
la Dial & Bundel) would be very useful. It would seem some mosaic synthesis
of the two competing views looks more inevitable every day.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Williams" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC?
Mickey Mortimer wrote:
Because "With the rotation
of the digits and other modifications to the manus, the use of the
unguals for grasping in the traditional
sense was lost. That is, the use of the unguals to grasp prey, or
vegetation for climbing in the normal
manner, does not work because the unguals now point anteriad, ..."
Silly question.... but how would _Archaeopteryx_ climb trees without using
its hands "in the normal manner"? Curiously, a climbing _Archaeopteryx_
has been integral to the idea of a "trees-down" origin of flight for
birds, which Campbell (following Martin and Feduccia) are pushing - as
opposed to a "ground-up" origin.
(BTW, I'm not necessarily arguing against a "trees-down" origin of flight.
However, despite what has sometimes been asserted, "trees-down" is not at
odds with "ground-up" [because pro-avians may have exhibited both
'cursorial' and 'arboreal' behaviors to varying degrees], and "trees-down"
is entirely compatible with birds being theropod dinosaurs.)
Get ideas on sharing photos from people like you. Find new ways to share.