[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Campbell's even crazier than a MANIAC? (archeopteryx climbing)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Boehm" <email@example.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 1:32 AM
I don't see how this follows.
If it can fly... it can glide - aside from direct thrust flight (rockets,
I don't think the ability to fly powered could have possibly come before
the *ability* to glide (that isn't to say they would routinely stop
I still don't see how this follows. Especially when I consider the lack of
tertials in Archie.
> I think its highly likely powered flight did not come
The fossil record points in the opposite direction: the
bats still haven't got the idea of soaring, and the birds
seem to only have evolved it after the Mesozoic was
over. Even the pterosaurs started with small forms that
didn't have particularly long wings.
Well, we don't know if bats ever did soar at any point in the past, and I
am specifically implying ridge soaring, not using thermals.
"Know" is too strong a word, but there's no evidence any bat ever soared,
neither direct nor phylogenetic nor even geographic. Ockham's Razor thus
argues against it.
And how actually would soaring evolve into flapping?
[...] I still think ridge soaring was probably one of the first niches a
ptero or dinobird occupied once it had wings giving it any kind of gliding
ability, before the wings and muscles were large enough for powered
The wings, at least, may well have become large enough for flight long
before flight started. That's because the wing feathers of birds may well
have evolved for brooding and/or display rather than any aerodynamic