[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: weird jurassic dinobird with very weird feathers
> In point of fact, had/if this paper had come to me for
> review, that is
> something I would grill them on. They do not clearly have
> the end of the
> tail, and yet they use this as major evidence of the
> distinction between it
> and _Epidendrosaurus_.
It ought not to have been done; this problem is common enough.
> Agreed. Additionally, I think we are within a year or four
> of numerous
> papers that might place Archie outside of Deinonychosauria
> + Avialae. Or
> within that clade, but not on the bird branch...
Probably the latter if I'd have to hazard a guess, though we'll have to see.
Geographically it is just too far off. It is good to have remains - any remains
- of anything reasonably close in phylogeny and time. I can only say that
again: irrespective of taxonomic, systematic, and interpretational issues, the
specimen in itself is an Invisible-Pink-Unicorn-send.
> homologies of the bones. Don't know what Nature is
Hmmm... "Publish or perish" perhaps?