[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Did dinosaur wings evolve for breeding display?
If wings evolved primarily as a display device for visual enhancement in
breeding, why do we see already functional aerodynamic structuring (i.e.,
unequal vane proportions) in the wing feathers of known flying dromaeosaurs?
Even though they don't make flight a possiblity any more, wing feathers do have
an important function in ratites like ostriches, but these feathers are soft,
fluffy and non-aerodynamic, which is what one would expect if wings had evolved
primarily as a sexual display organ. Also, unless both sexes practiced this
kind of display favoring the development of wings, wouldn't wings be present in
just one sex? --Mark Hallett
--- On Wed, 4/15/09, David Marjanovic <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: David Marjanovic <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: Did dinosaur wings evolve for breeding display?
> To: "DML" <email@example.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 4:12 AM
> ----- Original Message ----- From:
> To: David Marjanovic ; Guy Leahy
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:36 AM
> > Evolution is not competition within the species. I
> don't think I've ever heard this before.
> That means you've never before heard of the entire science
> of evolutionary biology.
> I have to go very soon; I'll write a detailed, less brusque
> answer today evening (and apologize that I haven't had time
> to write any more offlist messages to you). Just let me
> mention that the argument from ignorance is a logical
> fallacy. I suggest you spend the next few hours in Wikipedia
> and the sites it links to; yes, hours, I'm serious.