[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: New paper: Theropod forelimb evolution & Archie is not a "Rosetta stone"
Quoting Andreas Johansson <email@example.com>:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Roger Close <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > "Patristic" strikes me as a very poor term for something in
> > evolutionary biology. All the top hits I can find on Google are either
> > for this very paper, or for Christian/creationist sites.
> Patristics is a long-established term for the study of the Church
> Fathers (early but post-Biblical Christian writers). Using the word
> for something in biology strikes me as simply perverse.
Many of the earliest naturalists were priests.
Often they were men from well-to-do families who had a lot of spare time on
their hands (perhaps
having entered the priesthood for political reasons or as a way of avoiding
hard work, rather than
due to any specific 'calling'), but they were priests none-the-less.
GIS / Archaeologist http://dannsdinosaurs.dyn-o-saur.com
Melbourne, Australia http://heretichides.soffiles.com