[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: What faunas/formations were at the KT
Lance (Wyoming) is actually to the south of Hell Creek (Montana). I
drive over the border every day so there it is only nomenclatural/
geographic rather than any difference biostratigraphically between
Lance and Hell Creek. A pet peeve I have is that many formations over
the years that have been known for biostratigraphic reasons were
renamed for lithographic or geographic issues. It just adds to the
confusion. I dare anybody to show me a lithofacies difference between
the north part of my ranch (Hell Creek) and the south part (Lance).
(I own land in both states, stand with your feet straddling the
border, put your weight on Lance or hop over to Hell Creek.) I even
keep an amateur radio antenna on the border too so I can send from
both states at the same time. Lots of demand for that radio contact
when ever I get it up and going.
And yes, upper Cretaceous sequences are quite scarce.
Frank (Rooster) Bliss
On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:26 AM, David Marjanovic wrote:
We all know about Hell Creek, but what other faunas or formations
have been described at the time of the KT event?
Terrestrial ones? Not many. Some intertrappean bed or other
somewhere in India; however the formation in the Nanxiong Basin in
southern China is called; and to the north of the Hell Creek,
there's the Lance and the Scollard, AFAIK. That pretty much is it so