[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

CretAlamna vs. CretOlamna

As I understand it, Glickman described the Cretaceous shark CretAlamna in 1958, 
but since then nearly every scientist who discussed the genus referred to it as 
CretOlamna. Apparently the error is known, as Shimada mentioned it in a 2007 
paper on the genus, yet the mispelling still seems predominate (the genus is 
listed as CretOlamna in the PBDB, and Google offers the mispelling as a search 
suggestion when you search for the genuine article).

Now, is there a legitimate scientific *reason* for the continued use of 
CretOlamna, or is it just inertia and bad habits on the part of researchers?