[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Sauropod gastroliths
>From my quick read through of the linked paper, accidental swallowing sounds
>more likely, given the small amounts of "gastroliths" found.
And of course, mineral uptake does also make sense.
I have a hard time picturing such a long necked animal eating large amounts of
But I suppose if the turnover rate was low it would be feasible.
For that matter... the throat of such a long necked animal probably had some
very special adaptations for getting food from the head to the body, that we'll
never see unless a "dino-mummy" is found preserving soft tissue - which should
also answer the gastrolith question.
--- On Tue, 12/1/09, Dan Chure <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> From: Dan Chure <email@example.com>
> Subject: Re: Sauropod gastroliths
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Cc: "DML" <email@example.com>
> Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 11:49 AM
> Spencer Lucas referred to sauropod
> gastroliths as gastromyths which is pretty accurate.
> There are reputable gastroliths in some ornithischian
> specimens, but none convincingly in sauropods, or maybe even
> Fragomeni wrote:
> > Good morning, all!
> > I was reading Robert Bakker's "Dinosaur Heresies"
> today and am curious
> > about the Sauropod gastrolith issue.
> > Bakker, as well as many other Paleontologists,
> theorize that the giant
> > megaton Sauropods purposely ate stones to help aid in
> the digestion of
> > tough plants. However, I stumbled across this article
> online from 2007:
> > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2197205/
> > What is the most accepted theory today about Sauropods
> and the use of
> > gastroliths?
> > Ashley Fragomeni
> > Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
> > Los Angeles, CA 90007