[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Tethyshadros name issues
> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Tim Williams
> Lee Hall <email@example.com> wrote:
> > You're really going to bark up this
> > tree? The name is in print. It's
> > done. You're beating a dead horse.
> I guess by "dead horse" you're NOT referring to the
> _Hyracotherium_ vs _Eohippus_ naming issue. ;-)
Actually, related to that: work by Freholich and various others has shown
that _Eohippus_ is back.
Froehlich, D.J. 2002. "Quo vadis eohippus? The systematics and taxonomy of
the early Eocene equids (Perissodactyla)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean
Society 134 (2): 141-256.
Long story short, _Hyracotherium_ in the mid-late 20th Century sense is
paraphyletic with regards to other Equidae (and even other perissodactyl
groups), and the type species of _Eohippus_ is thus "freed" from its
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Faculty Director, Earth, Life & Time Program, College Park Scholars
Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA