[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
I haven't read the paper, but I noticed a comment by Brian Switek on teh
interwebz that disturbed me:
"Since venomous dinosaurs are entirely unknown, I think much more evidence is
Why he should say this is perplexing because the *only* reason that venomous
dinosaurs are unknown is because no one has checked any other taxa! Reading
around, I find most of arguments against the proposal to be rather shaky and
weak. Until I read the paper, my preliminary (note: preliminary) opinion is
that the authors are correct.
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:05:17 -0600
> From: email@example.com
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Dino-Venom!
> Haven't seen any one else post this one, so I thought I'd put it up. I
> haven't read the paper (if there even is one yet), but it definitely
> seems interesting.
> We just need to add a frill and find some evidence that it could spit
> that venom, and Jurassic Park will be that much more accurate :P
> Matt Demski
> Geological Sciences
> Clayton H. Riddell Faculty of Environment, Earth and Resources
> University of Manitoba
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
- From: Matt Demski <email@example.com>