[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
2007 or 2008?
Mesozoico Web writes:
> *Dear list:
> Here I come again with the same subject. I'm writing an article about
> the new argentinian dinosaurs taxons published in the year 2008 and I
> find a problem with the references about Muyelensaurus pecheni Gonzalez
> Riga Calvo and Porfiri, 2008 and Macrogryphosaurus gondwanicus Calvo,
> Porfiri and Novas, 2008 that appears in the Arquivos do Museu Nacional
> (do Río do Janeiro) 65(4) journal. The problem is that this journal it's
> refered to the year 2007 but it really appears avaible to the global
> paleontological comunity in 2008. The question is: I've to take this two
> species valid for the year 2007 or 2008?
> I have been consulting this subjetc with another colegues and I get
> different opinions about it. Maybe you'll can bring some light on the
> What do you think about it?
Definitely not 2007. I reviewed that paper and I wasn't even sent the
manuscript until February 2008, so it certainly wasn't published in
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "If the sparkle fades from your writing, keep writing till you
figure out how to get it back" -- Kristin Johnson.