[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Late Cretaceous Arctic Climates
David Marjanovic wrote:
Hang on a second. How much ice is necessary to account for the
sea-level changes? Does that amount really necessitate inland ice, or
are mountain glaciers (like those in southern Alaska which reach the
sea through a temperate rainforest) enough to explain the sea-level
changes and the Australian glacier sediments?
The sea level is supposed to have changed by 25 m, right? 22 m is the
difference between today and 400,000 years ago when Greenland and West
Antarctica were ice-free. Is there a way to distribute that much ice
over the high-altitude and high-latitude mountains of the Early
David - maximum sea level depth for the GAB in the late EK is 100-150
metres (as far as we can tell). Regressions seem to have been total,
i.e. sea levels fluctuated by at least 100-150m during the 4 (or maybe
6) transgresive cycles during the Australian EK. So, yes, that would be
a lot of ice melt.
I don't have an explanation for this... Would the extra land mass near
the south pole (i.e. a large part of Gondwana) possibly have allowed for
proportionally extra ice formation compared to Recent Antarctica?
Colin McHenry Ph.D.
Computational Biomechanics Research Group http://www.compbiomech.com/
School of Engineering (Mech Eng)
University of Newcastle
t: +61 2 4921 8879
m: 0412 659541