[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Resources, energetics and dinosaur maximal size
--- On Tue, 7/28/09, Richard W. Travsky <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Jura wrote:
>> McNab operates under the assumption (laid out in the
>> paper) that the largest terrestrial mammal known to have
>> existed (_Paraceratherium_ sp.), was probably operating at,
>> or near the maximum FMR for terrestrial animals in a
>> terrestrial ecology. In this case, it would be about
>> 170,0000 calories a day. The largest dinosaurs were about 8
>> times the size of _Paraceratherium_. If they were given a
>> mammalian metabolism, and concomitant FMR (as detailed in
>> the paper) then a 56 tonne _Brachiosaurus altithorax_ would
>> have to digest some 561,000 calories a day. This is asking a
>> lot for plant productivity of any time period.
> It's asking a lot of the animal involved. That's a lot of
> eating and effort.
At 4 "calories" per gm, and assuming 100% utilization of fibrous carbs, "561k
calories" is only about 140kg per day of feed (assuming equivalent units).
This is obviously do-able acquisition-wise, but assuming 10% digestion of fiber
is maybe not-so do-able...
Is it possible that micro-analysis of sauropod coprolites could get an estimate
on what the fiber content of sauro-dung might have been?