[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: New Ruben Paper
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Mortimer" <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:09 PM
Because BAND researchers have a habit of ignoring data that's been
discovered after 1980, in this case Pedopenna, scansoriopterygids, Lori,
Koparion and other Morrison teeth, Zinke's teeth from Guimarota...
*Pedopenna* and the scansoriopterygids may not count, because they're from
the Daohugou Beds, which could be as young as Barremian. However, what does
count is our very own Scott Hartman's undescribed troodontid from the
Morrison Formation (SVP meeting abstract 2007), and most likely also the
"raptor" that Nate Murphy stole.
And some of those teeth from Guimarota are specifically "dromaeosaurine".
That puts a lot of dromaeosaurid phylogeny into the Kimmeridgian or earlier.
The reason the BANDits don't know about any of that stuff is plain obvious:
_not one of them is interested in nonavian dinosaurs_. Not one of them
follows the relevant literature. They don't know, and they don't care! So
they end up making one argument from ignorance after another. Including
howlers like how Feduccia wrote in his 1996 book that the predator-prey
ratios of Late Cretaceous dinosaurs aren't evidence for endothermy because
the hadrosaurs were _*AQUATIC*_ and therefore had a much higher preservation
potential than the tyrannosaurs!!! It's so embarrassing, I get a bellyache
every time I think of it. And then a headache.
Hang on a second. What is *Lori*???