[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Long-necked stegosaur coming out in Proceedings B
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Long-necked stegosaur coming out in Proceedings B
- From: Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:57:23 +0000
- Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
- Cc: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
Tim Williams writes:
> > "... two scenarios are possible."
> > "The first is that the long neck might have permitted it to
> > browse for foliage at a height not frequented by other
> > prehistoric animals. The second is that males and females might
> > have found the trait appealing, so it evolved due to sexual
> > selection.
> I would have suggested a third possibility (not the same as
> Dann's), which is that a longer neck would allow a better
> 'look-out' to scour the terrain for approaching predators.
> Interestingly, this idea is implicitly contradicted by the paper:
> "By contrast, the long neck of _Miragaia_ incurred a survival cost
> because it presented a greater predation target for medium to
> large-sized theropods..."
Please. Sauropod workers have been agonising over the functional and
evolutionary implications of long necks for decades -- surely these
arriviste stegosaur people don't think they're going to work it out
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <email@example.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "It takes a certain kind of bad writer to write badly sincerely"
-- Richard Sherbaniuk.