[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: juvenile triceratops



I think they meant they found Triceratops bones in a fossil bed containing 
bones of individuals of other species - thats the only thing they could have 
meant that would make sense to me.


--- On Tue, 3/24/09, Amtoine Grant <rascienz@shaw.ca> wrote:

> From: Amtoine Grant <rascienz@shaw.ca>
> Subject: Re: juvenile triceratops
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 11:00 AM
> "They have been found in enormous bone beds of multiple
> individuals, but all known Triceratops fossils up to now
> have been solitary individuals."
> Excuse my french, but...WTF?
> 
> On 24-Mar-09, at 11:28 AM, Ian Paulsen wrote:
> 
> > HI:
> >  FYI:
> > 
> >
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090324/sc_livescience/gangofjuveniledinosaursdiscovered;_ylt=AhAed7kA0KbUM3LOfWN5KToPLBIF
> > 
> > --
> > Ian Paulsen
> > Bainbridge Island, WA, USA
> > " Which just goes to show that a
> >   passion for books is extremely unhealthy."
> >  from Cornelia Funke's "Inkheart".