[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Size of *Neoceratodus africanus* and/or *N. tuberculatus*
Raptorial Talon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I suppose the bottom line is, why were animals as large as spinosaurs
> possessed of such an unusual head/neck morphology? Pretty much every
> other group of large theropods has robust skulls adapted to
> either hacking/slashing or gouging/crushing - features suitable
> for big predators taking big prey.
Briefly, there are several large to very large theropods that do not appear to
have been specialized for taking big prey: _Therizinosaurus_, _Gigantoraptor_,
and possibly _Deinocheirus_ (especially if an ornithomimosaur).
> Yet spinosaurs are virtually antithetical
> to this arrangement, being large to very large predators
> that are very ill-suited to taking large prey.
All this tells me is that spinosaurids had different prey preferences to
carnosaurs, tyrannosaurs etc, with spinosaurs including a higher proportion of
smaller prey items in their diet (small ornithopods, pterosaurs, fish).
> I would strongly suspect that, at the very least,
> the taking of aquatic prey was an important driver in
> spinosaur evolution, even if other prey types continued to be
> imporant food sources.
You could be right. The cranial adaptations of spinosaurs might indeed have
been geared toward improved piscivory. But I doubt this is why spinosaurids
got so big.