[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Size of *Neoceratodus africanus* and ...

As this thread has been updated with new posts, I just want to add something 
new (according to me) on Spinosauridae.
We now have the certainty there were semi-aquatic dinosaurs, spending mostly 
their time into water, as crocodiles and turtles do
(http://spinosauridae.fr.gd/Actualit-e2--des-Spinosauridae.htm, see the 
abstract "Were some dinosaurs aquatic?").
I know it won't be surprising for some of you but we have to admit spinosaurids 
are usually seen as terrestrial animals and this was a matter of debate 


> Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 07:37:57 -0500
> From: raptorialtalon@gmail.com
> To: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
> CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: Size of *Neoceratodus africanus* and ...
> I believe that I did, briefly, but in the other edition of this thread.
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:35 AM, David Marjanovic
>  wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "don ohmes" 
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:06 AM
>>> --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Dann Pigdon  wrote:
>>>> Quoting don ohmes :
>>>>> If, as a biped, you spend a lot of time catching fish,
>>>>> specifically exploiting fluvial systems w/ lot of shallow
>>>>> water and fluctuating water levels, you will be competing
>>>>> w/ crocs, or just trying to stay off _their_ menu. Especially
>>>>> around those drying pools w/ the trapped fish. Reason enough
>>>>> to attain large size, as well as maintain a high degree of
>>>>> terrestrial competence.
>>>> Deinosuchus would have laughed at a spinosaur's
>>>> 'large size'.
>>> Assuming a Deinosuchus equivalent actually _was_ coeval w/ the
>>> conical-toothed spinosaurs, which wouldn't be surprising;
>> I hope someone mentioned *Sarcosuchus*, but I can't find if anyone did.

100% GRATUIT: tout ce dont vous avez besoin sur le net et sur votre PC !