[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Aquatic Origin of birds (was Aquatic spinosaurs (was Size of *Neoceratodus africanus*))
Amtoine Grant <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't
> the earliest specimens of Archaeopteryx found in
> aquatic deposits from ecosystems relatively devoid of
I'm not saying you're wrong; but I think the answer might be more complicated.
According to one ref (Viohl, 1985), _Archaeopteryx_'s Solnhofen habitat was "a
bushland of conifers and Bennititaleans alternating with areas of sparse
Also, because _Archaeopteryx_ could fly (probably), its ecology presumably
wasn't limited to the immediate vicinity of Solnhofen.
Erik Boehm wrote:
> Has anyone suggested bird-like feathers + wings
> evolved first as flippers?
There was some paper by a guy named Klaus Ebel, who argued that bird flight
(and pterosaur flight too) evolved in the water. Then again, he also argues
that all saurischian dinosaurs (non-avian) were aquatic. That tells you where
he's coming from.
> I think small aquatic dino-birds might not fossilize
> too well, and wouldn't leave much evidence..
I'd expect aquatic 'dino-birds' to have a much better chance of fossilization
than inland, forest-living 'dino-birds'.