[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria
> That's not how it works. In the ICZN, precedence does not apply
> above the family group of ranks; the PhyloCode still isn't
> implemented and won't be retroactive. So, do what you want.
True. But it's still at least _polite_ to follow priority of clade
definitions in the absence of a compelling reason not to.
Yes. I should have added "but think long and hard about what you really
For example, it's not even clear whether *Prolacerta* and *Protorosaurus*
form a clade that excludes the archosaurs...