[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: How The Giraffe Got (or didn't get) Its Long Neck



On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:23 PM,  <dinoboygraphics@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> In that pace we will go back to "lamarckism".<<<
>
> Huh?  You can derive elongate necks that aid in feeding with a Darwinian
> selective regime.  Just because people use the case of giraffe necks to
> contrast Darwinian selection with Lamarckian change (or rather a caricature
> thereof) doesn't imply that both can't be used to explain it (note, I am not
> endorsing Lamarck's ideas, merely agreeing with S.J. Gould that the textbook
> description of his idea is a caricature of the position Lamarck actually
> held).

I'm just kidding. (And the reason for I've used quote marks in
lamarckism is to distinguish it from Lamarck's ideas - continuous
espontaneous generation, phyletic independance, progressive
evolution.)

[]s,

Roberto Takata