[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Darwin's young dead pet from Messel
> Oh, *Panphagia* was published in PLoS ONE, too? That's good, because it
> means the name can still be fixed. You see, it's an atrocity.
> Meant to mean "everything-eater", it doesn't have the right suffix. -ia
> suggests an abstract noun, like "all-eatery" or something. That ending also
> makes the word feminine, which clashes with the masculine *protos*. Had it
> been validly published, we'd be stuck with all of this, even the gender
> mismatch because only Latin adjectives must fit according to the ICZN. This
> way there's still hope!
Is not there a principle of the first reviewer, which can correct a