[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The Men Who Stare At New Papers
The paper is crap.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Michael Erickson <email@example.com> wrote:
The paper by Kavanau interests me the most. I'll definitely have to
see that one. Considering the massive amount of bias against the
notion of secondarily flightless dino-birds*, I'm not too surprised
that the good man was forced to publish in Medical Hypotheses.
Although it could also just be because the paper is crap.
* I never have understood why a hypothesis that's so well supported by
heaps of evidence would be so harshly ignored and rejected by the