[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: FW: New BBC series research

What I've already written is about all there is to know, sadly.  It's
a very complete (by British standards) sauropod from the Wealden
Supergroup, but because it's in private hands it's not been published
on, nor even looked at much.  Blows (1995) referred it to Eucamerotus,
but his conception of that genus is not particularly well-founded and
I don't necessarily trust his referral.  At the moment, all that can
be said with confidence is that it's a sauropod.

Some parts of it have been on loan to the Dinosaur Isle museum on the
Isle of Wight for the last ten years or so, and are displayed in a
bizarre wall-mount wherein they are embedded in fake matrix to look
like an idealised dig-site.  It's not easy to make much sense of the
material in that context, but I did once notice that the scapulae are
strap-like, like those of Apatosaurus.

We all hope that some day soon that specimen will make it into the
ownership of a museum where it can be studied (ideally by me!)

2009/11/17 dale mcinnes <wdm1949@hotmail.com>:
> Fill me in on the Barnes High sauropod please. --dale
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:21:24 +0000
>> From: mike@indexdata.com
>> To: john.bass@ntlworld.com
>> CC: alex.freeman@bbc.co.uk; mwildman@saurian.org; dinosaur@usc.edu
>> Subject: Re: New BBC series research
>> 2009/11/8 john hunt :
>>>>> How abut the British Wealden group? Baryonyx, Neovenetar, Eotyrannus and
>>>>> the stuff they fed on.
>>>> How can you go talking about THOSE crappy Wealden dinosaurs and
>>>> overlook the unquestionable master of them all?
>>>> My name is Xenoposeidon, king of kings:
>>>> Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!
>>> All those theropods had to eat something!
>>> Can you do a reconstruction from 1 bone?
>> Can we? No. But did we? Heck, yeah!
>> http://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/xenoposeidon-skeleton.jpeg
>>> Are the other Wealden sauropod
>>> remains attributable to the same species - hell there is a full program just
>>> on that!
>> If only we knew! As SV-POW! fans will know, Wealden sauropod
>> systematics is a mess. Partly that's just because so many specimens
>> are fragmentary, partly it's because the Wealden's involvement in the
>> earliest days of dino palaeontology means that it had a lot of genera
>> named on what we now recognise as non-diagnostic specimens, and partly
>> it's because various people, hoping to clear all this up, have instead
>> made it much worse by referring various specimens to different genera
>> and synonymising left right and centre on inadequate evidence. While
>> it's clear that there is no other known sauropod vertebra remotely
>> like the Xeno holotype, it's still possible that, for example, the
>> Pelorosaurus conybeari humerus is from the same animal.
>> Most tantalising of all: I've never seen the dorsal vertebrae of the
>> privately owned Barnes High sauropod. It's possible (not likely, but
>> possible) that they have a substantially complete Xenoposeidon there.
>> Fingers crossed that time will tell!
> _________________________________________________________________
> New! Open Messenger faster on the MSN homepage
> http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9677405