[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: *Mauisaurus* vs large pterosaurs
2009/10/7 don ohmes <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> Wait, wait -- Hiller et al. (2005:600) in JVP diagnosed
>> Mauisaurus as
>> "The species is characterized as an elasmosaur of more than
>> meters adult length and possessing at least 68 cervical
>> Based on typical elasmosaur proportions, that would make
>> the neck
>> something like 4 m long. Has someone subsequently
>> found a specimen
>> that is 3-4 times bigger?
> As mentioned, the neck length was taken from wikipedia, and is apparently
> incorrect... perhaps you could fix that?
Well, I don't want to go ploughing in from my position of ignorance --
maybe there are new and much larger specimens? But if any of our
resident sauropterygian jockeys want to leap in and edit that baby,
I'd be in favour of that.