[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: FW: *Mauisaurus* vs large pterosaurs

dale mcinnes wrote:

 <4ACD0D0F.2010308@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 MIME-Version: 1.0

(Why do I get to see source text? And BTW, where does all this "=20" and "=2C" stuff come from? Till a month ago that never happened on the DML.)

 WHOOOOAA!! =20 The body of the elasmosaurid would not just sit there
 while the cervical series topped with skull did a slam dunk. Very
 ugly. Think pretty. What gracefully slides up and out most likely and
 gracefully = slipped back down.=20

It couldn't slide up gracefully, or at all, in the first place. I mean, think about it. The neck is at least as long as the rest of the body, very stiff, and massive. That's not a pneumatic sauropod we're talking about here. A plesiosaur neck was a massive rod of bone, muscle, ligament, tracheal rings (cartilaginous, I suppose), and practically nothing else. Where is the center of gravity of such an animal? Far enough behind that it could stick its entire neck out of the water? I don't think so.

 Further to mention that a generalist would probably take a pterosaur
 once in a while.

Sure, but that's not the question; the question is whether it would happen often enough to drive elasmosaurid evolution.

 Check out the elasmosaurids in the latest Journey
 to the Centre of the Eart= h. Truly believable and down right truly
 terrifying!! The animators did a s= pectacular job on them.
 Everything else was garbage. But the film is worth = purchasing just
 for that one scene! Spectacular!! --dale =20 =20

Basing scientific hypotheses on pretty/impressive pictures is what has given us BAND. Be careful with this approach.