[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Not: why the long face? but:why the long neck?
While these lizards weren't around way
back in the dino-age, it sounds as if
animals of similar design would have put
up one heck of a battle if attacked by
a hungry predator.
I have a feeling alot of these contests were
much more rowdy, violent, and lasted shorter
than we perceive today.
I wish you guys would find a tyranno-ceratopsian
fossil locked in death, the long horns run-thru
the tyrannosaur - that would be stupendous -
I could see the museums fighting over THAT one!
--- On Sun, 10/11/09, Dann Pigdon <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: Dann Pigdon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: Not: why the long face? but:why the long neck?
> To: email@example.com
> Date: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 11:12 PM
> On Mon, Oct 12th, 2009 at 9:59 AM, B
> tH <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > I can see where a large monitor whipping its
> > tail could both sting/hurt and perhaps even
> > break a bone, but a smaller one really doesn't
> > pose much of an issue with its tail, does it?
> The tail of a smaller monitor won't break any bones, but it
> *will* hurt like hell. It can be hard trying to
> concentrate on immobilising the bitey end if the other end
> is flailing about wildly. By immobilising the
> other end as well, you also prevent it from twisting it's
> body around so that the hind claws are facing
> you (which tend to be roughly at stomach or groin height if
> you're holding it while standing up).
> The combined whirlwind of teeth, claws and tail make trying
> to handle a wild monitor best left to
> experts (of which I'm certainly not one).
> Dann Pigdon
> GIS / Archaeologist
> Australian Dinosaurs
> Melbourne, Australia