[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: FW: The ground-nowhere hypothesis on the origin of bird flight (joke)
Hmmm. Perhaps the drop-bear is attracted to camera straps?
More seriously -- mammals need to eat way too often to be able to just sit in a
tree and wait for something to happen to walk underneath them. There is another
factor too; most prey is alert enough that missing your initial pounce is
likely, and if a prey species are slow movers, then actively searching works
better than waiting anyway. All in all, I think pouncing is highly over-rated,
at least in today's world.
The local anoles seem to use it w/ success on insects, though, so I think it
still plays in flight evolution cartoons.
Humans hunt deer from trees of course, w/ good success, but use projectile
weapons to greatly increase their killing range as well as various baits,
scents, and calls. I once calculated the cost of licensing, special clothes,
weapons, trucks, refrigeration and other accessories and came up w/ a total
cost 250$US/lb for venison (although assuming 2 deer/year for 10 years, and 10
years per truck it gets closer to 15$US).
--- On Mon, 10/12/09, Tim Williams <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: Tim Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: FW: The ground-nowhere hypothesis on the origin of bird flight
> To: email@example.com
> Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 12:11 AM
> Dann Pigdon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > I've seen lots of leopard hunting footage over the
> > but I've never seen a leopard leap onto
> > prey from above.
> I'm sure there are other examples, but the only mammal I
> can think of that leaps out trees to attack prey on the
> ground is the drop-bear of Australia. British and
> Japanese tourists are its preferred prey.