[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Dinosaurs Decoded



As far as I'm concerned, the hypothesis that _Dracorex_ and _Stygimoloch_ are 
jeuvenile _Pachycephalosaurus_ is complete and utter bunk. Bakker gives a good 
rebuttal here:
 
http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps/2008/04/paleontological_profiles_rober.php
 

> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:23:08 -0400
> From: htomsirveaux@hotmail.com
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Dinosaurs Decoded
> 
> 
> Did anyone besides me stick around after BIZARRE DINOSAURS for the second 
> special, DINOSAURS DECODED? Not much new information, but it was entertaining.
> 
> One issue though. I know *Dracorex* is sunk into *Pachycephalosaurus*, but 
> Jack Horner is now speculating that *Stygimoloch* deserves the same fate. Is 
> there any corroborating evidence or further support among the Paleontological 
> community? Or is this Horner's next STFU theory?
> 
> Tommy Bradley
> 
> P.S. Those baby trikes were so cute!!!
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/                              
>           
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/