[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Dinosaurs Decoded
As far as I'm concerned, the hypothesis that _Dracorex_ and _Stygimoloch_ are
jeuvenile _Pachycephalosaurus_ is complete and utter bunk. Bakker gives a good
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:23:08 -0400
> From: email@example.com
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Dinosaurs Decoded
> Did anyone besides me stick around after BIZARRE DINOSAURS for the second
> special, DINOSAURS DECODED? Not much new information, but it was entertaining.
> One issue though. I know *Dracorex* is sunk into *Pachycephalosaurus*, but
> Jack Horner is now speculating that *Stygimoloch* deserves the same fate. Is
> there any corroborating evidence or further support among the Paleontological
> community? Or is this Horner's next STFU theory?
> Tommy Bradley
> P.S. Those baby trikes were so cute!!!
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.