[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Shameless paper request, and a naive question
I would suggest a couple pubs.
1) Carr, T.D. 1999. "Craniofacial Ontogeny in Tyrannosauridae
(Dinosauria, Coelurosauria)" Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19(3);
2) Carr, T.D., Williamson, T.E. 2004 "Diversity of Late Maastrichtian
Tyrannosauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from Western North America"
Zoological Jouornal of the Linnean Society 142: 479-523
From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu] On Behalf
Of Michael Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:03 PM
To: Dino List
Subject: Shameless paper request, and a naive question
Shameless Paper Request:
Can anyone supply me with
Bakker, Williams, and Currie (1988). "Nanotyrannus, a new genus of pygmy
tyrannosaur, from the latest Cretaceous of Montana." Hunteria,
I'd very much appreciate it. That's not fluff, I mean it.
In the paper I am requesting, isn't it determined that _Nanotyrannus_ is
an adult, due to full ossification of the cranial elements? If this is
the case, how can _Nanotyrannus_ be a juvenile at all, let alone a
juvenile _Tyrannosaurus rex_? Is there some kind of awesome paper I'm
missing? And if there is, does said paper CONVINCINGLY refute Bakker,
Williams, and Currie's claim the cranial elements are fully ossified?
See, I told you it was a naive question.
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.