[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: A new term for "missing link"
2009/10/14 Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> I don't understand all the missing-linkl hatin'. We all get that
> evolution is bush, not a straight line. Still, the sequence of
> ancestors leading a given species IS a sequence; other lineages branch
> off it, sure, but that lineage is a straight line. And if a link is
> missing from that lineage, what's the problem with calling it a
> missing link? Really?
I suppose it is because one thinks of ancestors when talking about a
And some theorethical considerations have been raised against the
possibility of recognizing ancestors, for example:
Engelmann, G. F. and Wiley, E. O. 1977. The place of
ancestor-descendant relationships in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst.
Zool. 26: 1-11.